ⓘ Advance notice - essential maintenance taking place 2 and 3 April. There will be no access to website services during this time. This includes the member area, PLI certificates, iCSP and the comments functions.
 

What is evidence based practice?

There is much debate about what EBP is and whether the traditional model of EBP needs updating.

Thumbnail

Useful definitions

The term evidence-based practice (EBP) has developed from the term evidence-based medicine (EBM) which was introduced into medical literature in 1991 [1].

A commonly used definition of EBM is:
'the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients' [2].

In 2005, an EBM international working group introduced the term evidence-based practice (EBP) and published ‘the Sicily statement on evidence-based practice’ which includes the following definition:

'Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) requires that decisions about health care are based on the best available, current, valid and relevant evidence. These decisions should be made by those receiving care, informed by the tacit and explicit knowledge of those providing care, within the context of available resources'[3].

Thumbnail

Both definitions suggest that EBP requires the integration of best research evidence, individual clinical expertise and patient choice.

The diagram demonstrates the importance of different sources of evidence, from research, clinical practice and patients. For each individual patient and every clinical decision, the relative contribution of each evidence source (size of circle) may vary considerably.

There is much debate about what EBP is and whether the traditional model of EBP needs updating.

Further resources

Physiotherapy UK 2015 debate on research evidence

The motion was “this house believes that in the absence of research evidence an intervention should not be used”

There were two speakers for the motion, Professor Sallie Lamb, University of Oxford and Professor Rob de Bie, Maastricht University; and two speakers against the motion, Associate Professor Roger Kerry, University of Nottingham and Professor Michael Loughlin, Manchester Metropolitan University.

The ‘againsts’ won the debate.

Further reflections on the debate

Page references

  1. Guyatt G Evidence-based medicine ACP J Club 1991 A-16:114
  2. Sackett DL et al. 1996 Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 1996; 312: 71-2
  3. Dawes M, Summerskill W, Glasziou P et al 2005 Sicily statement on evidence-based practice BMC Medical Education 5(1) 1-7
Last reviewed: