Abstract
Background
Similar to other countries worldwide, Scotland lacked a national view of whether the quality of the physiotherapy management of low back pain was compliant with national guidelines. Anecdotal evidence suggested that standards of care varied considerably despite the wide availability of clinical guidelines to clinicians.
Aim
To develop a framework that supports National Health Service (NHS) Scotland in providing consistently applied high-quality physiotherapy assessment and management of low back pain in line with guideline recommendations.
Design
Prospective, multicentred national study, data collection and improvement phase.
Setting
All NHS boards in Scotland (n
=14) plus two private provider sites.
Participants
One hundred and eighty-six individual NHS sites and two private providers of services to patients with low back pain.
Method
A national dataset was developed from evidence- and consensus-based guideline sources. All sites collected data (two 5-week periods) over 1 year (2008–2009) using a web-based database. This was interspersed by an improvement phase during which required improvements were considered and implemented. Issues were shared through a national network and national meeting.
Results
Data from 2147 patients showed improvements in the documented physiotherapy management of low back pain over the two cycles. All participants developed and implemented remedial action plans based on the results of the first cycle.
Conclusion
It is possible to implement a framework, which is led nationally but driven and owned locally, supporting physiotherapists in an active programme of locally determined improvement. However, although process and outcome are linked, the direct impact of this initiative on patient outcome is not known.
Citation
A national framework for supporting improvements in the physiotherapy assessment and management of low back pain: the Scottish experience
Fraser Ferguson, Lesley Holdsworth, Danny Rafferty
Physiotherapy - September 2010 (Vol. 96, Issue 3, Pages 198-205, DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2010.02.001)