The Chartered Society of Physiotherapy The Chartered Society of Physiotherapy

Basket

View your shopping cart.

Exercise interventions for patients with gynaecological cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background

People with gynaecological cancer commonly suffer from physical and psychological symptoms related to their cancer and cancer treatment.

Objective

To evaluate and synthesise the evidence examining the effect of interventions with an exercise component for females with gynaecological cancer.

Data sources

Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed, PEDro, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library were searched systematically in September 2014.

Study selection

Randomised controlled trials were included if they investigated the effects of interventions with an exercise component in patients with gynaecological cancer.

Study appraisal

Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias of studies using the PEDro scale.

Results

Seven randomised controlled trials on five patient groups involving 221 participants were included. The mean PEDro score was 5.3 (standard deviation 1.5) out of 10. Compared with control groups, the intervention groups showed significantly greater improvements in physical activity levels and body mass index. No significant effects were found for fatigue, depression and health-related quality of life. A meta-analysis of functional exercise capacity and muscle strength was not possible due to insufficient data in the included trials.

Limitations

The majority of studies provided exercise as part of multicomponent intervention programmes.

Conclusions

Interventions with an exercise component appear to be effective at improving physical activity levels and body mass index among patients with gynaecological cancer. Further research is required to examine the effects of exercise interventions alone in this population.

Systematic review registration number

PROSPERO CRD42014014019.

Cite this article

Exercise interventions for patients with gynaecological cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Links

Back to top