Project measurement

Use this page for more information about:

Service information checklist

This service information check-list was developed as a by-product of the project. It is a possible starting point for those responsible for planning or introducing an outpatient musculoskeletal service.

It is acknowledged that in addition there may be other local or national information needing consideration. This information however, provides an initial dataset that will help build an evidence base for the service and provide the means to thoroughly describe its rationale (why?) and makeup (how?), the impact it has made and the outcomes achieved (so what?). It will also allow service leaders to examine the cost-effectiveness of the service and provide meaningful comparisons to support future developments.

General information

Description of the population the service area covers i.e. size, urban/rural, deprivation.

  • Prevalence rates among the general population
  • How the clinical condition/service area features in national or local health plans/strategies
  • The evidence base including any professional or organisational standards relating to this condition ie CSP, NICE, SIGN.

Service information

If developing a completely new service, you should ensure that you have baseline information that relates to the year BEFORE the service was introduced to allow comparison and evaluation.

Baseline data

  • Number of referrals made to orthopaedic services per annum by type i.e. spinal, peripheral joint, knee etc (include diagnostic codes if possible)
  • Waiting times
  • Source of referrals i.e. GP Open access, other sources
  • Where the service is provided, ie location
  • Who provides the service ie number and profession/ grade of staff (WTE)
  • Gender and Age breakdown (use nationally defined age groups)
  • Proportion of outpatient referrals that proceed to physiotherapy
  • Proportion of outpatient referrals that proceed to surgery
  • Re-referral rate.

Developing the service

  • Training requirements for staff
  • Competencies required including description of scope of practice ie level of experience, injection therapy, acupuncture, ability to order investigations, prescribing etc
  • Referral and management guidelines/pathways developed
  • Patient involvement in development process
  • Patient Information
  • Communication strategies with referrers and other key staff and patient groups
  • Where the service is provided, i.e. location Who provides the service i.e. number and profession/ grade of staff (WTE)
  • Time/s of day when the service operates
  • Provide timescales for periods described. It is more usual to report figures based on yearly activity

Service description

  • Waiting times
  • Number of referrals made to service
  • Number of referrals made to orthopaedic services per annum by type ie spinal, peripheral joint, knee etc (include diagnostic codes if possible)
  • Source of referrals ie GP Open access, other sources?
  • DNA at first appointment rate
  • Gender and Age breakdown (use nationally defined age groups)
  • Appropriateness of referral based on defined criteria
  • Employment status & work absence
  • Assessment tools used (validated?) include a measure of the patient’s perception of the severity of their problem
  • Investigations undertaken including X-rays, scans, blood tests etc
  • Management plan including type/s of intervention & information provided
  • Number of total service contacts
  • Discharge reason ie re-referred, intervention complete, failed to complete etc.

Outcomes

Use validated scales, if at all possible, if not, provide a reason. Record:

  • A measure of outcome of intervention
  • A measure of the patient’s perception of severity at discharge (if appropriate)
  • The patient’s perception of the service, its acceptability and quality
  • Professional Body/National organisation standards – level of achievement
  • Work absence and/or status
  • The proportion of outpatient referrals that proceed to surgery
  • The impact made on the workload of others
  • The impact made on the working lives/CPD of physiotherapists
  • Re-referral rate
  • Consider patient follow-up to provide a longer term view.

List of outcome measures

Outcome measures database linkKey references
Berg Balance Score Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Gayton D (1989) Measuring Balance in the Elderly: preliminary development of an instrument Physiotherapy Canada 41, 6, 304-311
Disability Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH)Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C. (2001) Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. Journal of Hand Therapy Apr-Jun;14(2):128-46 Hudak PL, Amadio PC, et al. (1996) Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG) American Journal of Industrial Medicine 29(6): 602-8.
EQ5D The EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol - A new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life Health Policy 16 199-208
Functional Index Questionnaire (FIQ)Chesworth, Culham, Tata, Peat. (1989) Validation of outcome measures in patients with patellofemoral syndrome Journal of Sports Physical Therapy 11, 302-8
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Roos EM, Roos HP, et al. (1998) Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) Development of a self administered outcome measure Journal of Orthopaedic Sports Physical Therapy 78, 2, 88-96
Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) Binkley JM, Stratford PW, et al. (1999) The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network. Physical Therapy 79(4): 371-83
MYMOP Paterson C. (1996) Measuring outcomes in primary care: a patient generated measure, MYMOP, compared with the SF-36 health survey. British Medical Journal 312(7037): 1016-20.
Oswestry Disability IndexFairbank JC, Pynsent PB. (2000) The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 25:2940-2953.
Pain Disability Index Chibnall JT et al. (1994) The Pain Disability Index: factor structure and normative data Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 75, 10, 1082 – 6 Measure described in these three articles:
  • Gronblad M et al. (1993) Inter-correlation and test-retest reliability of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients. The Clinical Journal of Pain 9
  • Tait RC et al.(1990) The Pain Disability Index: psychometric properties. Pain 40, 171-82
  • Pollard CA. (1984) Preliminary validity study of Pain Disability Index. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 59,974.
  • Jerome A, Gross RT. (1991) Pain Disability Index: construct and discriminant validity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 72, 920-2
Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) Chatman AB, Hyans SP, Neel JM, Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Schomberg A, Stabler M. (1997) The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: Measurement Properties in Patients with Knee Dysfunction. Physical Therapy 77, 8, 820-829 Westaway MD, Stratford PW, Binkley JM. (1998) The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: Validation of Its Use in Persons with Neck Dysfunction. Journal of Sports Physical Therapy 27, 5, 331-338
Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ)Roland M, Fairbank J. (2000) The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 25:3115-3124
SF36® and SF-12® HealthThese are internationally standardised assessment tools for the measurement of physical and emotional well-being and are quoted in many publications.Ware JE. (2000) SF-36 health survey update. Spine. 25, 24, 3130-9
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK)Vlaeyen J, Kole-Snijders A, Boeren R, van Eek H. (1995) Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance Pain 62, 363-372
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Measure described in these articles:
  • Huskisson EC. (1974) Measurement of pain The Lancet 9, 2, 1127-1131.
  • Sim J, Waterfield J. (1997) Validity, reliability and responsiveness in the assessment of pain Physiotherapy
  • Theory and Practice 13, 23-37.